王云泽,李英杰,唐立

• 1:石家庄铁道大学
• 2:省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室
• 3:河北省交通安全与控制重点实验室
• 4:石家庄铁道大学

摘要(Abstract)：

为了研究交通运输从业者对自动驾驶的接受意愿，确定影响接受度的关键因素，从而掌握交通运输从业者对自动驾驶的态度和关注点。通过分析交通运输从业者的职业特性，基于传统的技术接受模型（Technology Acceptance Model,TAM），综合考虑感知有用性、感知易用性、信任度和使用意愿四方面的功能认知和感知风险性的负面影响认知，并增加外部因素，兼顾个人属性特征的影响，加入从事该职业时长、个人月收入等职业变量，在此基础上设计调查问卷，对样本数据进行相关性分析和有序Logistic回归分析，筛选出自动驾驶接受度的关键影响因素。结果表明，交通运输从业者对自动驾驶的接受度较高，但与普通人群具有一定的区别；感知有用性、感知易用性、信任和使用意愿对自动驾驶的接受度具有显著正向影响；感知风险性具有显著负向影响；受教育程度和个人月收入对接受度也有一定的影响，受教育程度越高、个人月收入越高，对自动驾驶的接受度也越高。研究结论可以为提升自动驾驶汽车落地推广的策略提供一定的理论依据，同时也为政府制定相关政策提供依据。

关键词(KeyWords)： 智能交通;自动驾驶接受度;有序Logistic回归模型;技术接受模型;交通运输从业者

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 河北省省级科技计划项目（21550802D）;; 河北省自然科学基金项目（E2019210247）;; 河北省高等学校科学技术研究项目（QN2018238）;; 国家自然科学基金项目（5210120621）;; 四川省科技计划重点研发项目（2022YFS0565）

作者(Author): 王云泽,李英杰,唐立

DOI: 10.19961/j.cnki.1672-4747.2022.06.024

参考文献(References)：

• [1]李克强，戴一凡，李升波，等.智能网联汽车(ICV)技术的发展现状及趋势[J].汽车安全与节能学报, 2017, 8(1):1-14.LI Ke-qiang, DAI Yi-fan, LI Sheng-bo, et al. State-of-theart and technical trends of intelligent and connected vehicles[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2017, 8(1):1-14.
• [2] PANAGIOTOPOULOS I, DIMITRAKOPOULOS G. An empirical investigation on consumers’intentions towards autonomous driving[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2018, 95:773-784.
• [3]唐立,卿三东,徐志刚,等.自动驾驶公众接受度研究综述[J].交通运输工程学报, 2020, 20(2):131-146.TANG Li, QING San-dong, XU Zhi-gang, et al. Research review on public acceptance of autonomous driving[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020,20(2):131-146.
• [4] KOUL S, EYDGAHI A. Utilizing Technology Acceptance Model(TAM)for driverless car technology Adoption[J]. Journal of Technology Management&Innovation, 2018, 13(4):37-46.
• [5] CHOI J K, JI Y G. Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle[J]. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2015, 31(10):692-702.
• [6]席海角.自动驾驶公交接受度及选择意愿研究[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2020.XI Hai-jiao. Study on the acceptability and choice intention of self-driving public transport[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2020.
• [7]李继朴,贺宜,孙昌鑫,等.基于SEM的自动驾驶汽车接受度模型与风险分析[J].交通信息与安全, 2021, 39(1):26-34.LI Ji-pu, HE Yi, SUN Chang-xin, et al. An acceptance model and risk analysis of automated vehicles based on SEM[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety,2021, 39(1):26-34.
• [8]张曦月. L3级自动驾驶汽车接受意愿及选择行为研究[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2020.ZHANG Xi-yue. Willingness to acceptance and choice behavior of L3 autonomous vehicles[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2020.
• [9]胡晓伟,石腾跃,于璐,等.基于扩展技术接受度模型的共享自动驾驶汽车用户使用意愿研究[J].交通运输工程与信息学报, 2021, 19(3):1-12.HU Xiao-wei, SHI Teng-yue, YU Lu, et al. Measuring users’willingness to use shared autonomous vehicles based on an extension technology acceptance model[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2021, 19(3):1-12.
• [10]裘梦琪,周竹萍,梅亚岚.基于行人行为与优化CTAM模型的全自动驾驶车辆行人接受度分析[J].交通运输研究, 2021, 7(4):18-26, 34.QIU Meng-qi, ZHOU Zhu-ping, MEI Ya-lan. Pedestrian acceptance of fully autonomous vehicles based on pedestrian behavior and optimized CTAM model[J]. Transport Research, 2021, 7(4):18-26, 34.
• [11]景鹏,王伟,吴麟麟.老年人对自动驾驶汽车接受度研究[J].中国公路学报, 2021, 34(6):158-171.JING Peng, WANG Wei, WU Lin-lin. Acceptance of autonomous vehicles for the elderly[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(6):158-171.
• [12] FAGNANT D J, KOCKELMAN K. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles:opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2015, 77:167-181.
• [13] HARPER C D, HENDRICKSON C T, MANGONES S,et al. Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2016, 72:1-9.
• [14]李振龙，邢冠仰，李佳，等.基于扩展TAM的车路协同系统驾驶人接受度研究[J].中国公路学报, 2021, 34(7):188-200.LI Zhen-long, XING Guan-yang, LI Jia, et al. Driver’s acceptance of cooperative vehicle infrastructure system based on extended TAM[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(7):188-200.
• [15] HOHENBERGER C, SP?RRLE M, WELPE I M. How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2016, 94:374-385.
• [16] JARDIM A S, QUARTULLI A M, CASLEY S V. A study of public acceptance of autonomous cars[R].Worcester:Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2013.
• [17] SCHOETTLE B, SIVAK M. A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia[C]//2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo(ICCVE). November 3-7, 2014, Vienna, Austria. IEEE, 2015:687-692.
• [18] DAVIS F D, VENKATESH V. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model:three experiments[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1996, 45(1):19-45.
• [19] SHERIDAN T B. Considerations in modeling the human supervisory controller[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes,1975, 8(1):223-228.
• [20] Workshop on research and modeling of supervisory control behavior. research and modeling of supervisory control behavior:report of a workshop[M]. Washington D.C.:National Academy Press, 1984
• [21] GHAZIZADEH M, PENG Y, LEE J D, et al. Augmenting the technology acceptance model with trust:commercial drivers’attitudes towards monitoring and feedback[J]. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2012, 56(1):2286-2290.
• [22] DEB S, STRAWDERMAN L, CARRUTH D W, et al.Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess pedestrian receptivity toward fully autonomous vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2017, 84:178-195.
• [23] MENON N, PINJARI A, ZHANG Y, et al. Consumer perception and intended adoption of autonomous-vehicle technology:findings from a university population survey[C]//Transportation Research Board 95thAnnual Meeting Location.Washington D.C.:TRB,2016:1394249.
• [24] HULSE L M, XIE H, GALEA E R. Perceptions of autonomous vehicles:relationships with road users, risk, gender and age[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 102:1-13.
• [25]黄位.基于计划行为理论与技术接受模型的自动驾驶汽车接受度研究[D].镇江:江苏大学, 2019.HUANG Wei. Research on the acceptance of fully autonomous vehicle based on theory of planned behavior and technology acceptance model[D]. Zhenjiang:Jiangsu University, 2019.
• [26] CHEN C F, CHEN P C. Applying the TAM to travelers'usage intentions of GPS devices[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(5):6217-6221.
• [27]李慧慧,胡启洲,雷爱国,等.基于计划行为理论的驾驶员未礼让行为研究[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2020, 18(4):110-119.LI Hui-hui, HU Qi-zhou, LEI Ai-guo, et al. Driver’s noncomity behavior based on planned behavior theory[J].Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information,2020, 18(4):110-119.
• [28] FORNELL C, LARCKER D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981,18(1):39.
• [29]郭淑芬,贾文静,武志芳.人口统计变量对城市居民雨水利用接受意愿影响的差异分析:基于可持续发展议程创新示范区669份问卷的分析[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(1):49-55.GUO Shu-fen, JIA Wen-jing, WU Zhi-fang. Difference analysis on the influence of demographic variables on urban residents’willingness to accept stormwater utilization:case study of Taiyuan city[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(1):49-55.
• [30]陈月霞,查奇芬,景鹏,等.考虑年龄异质性的自动驾驶接受度建模与分析[J].江苏大学学报(自然科学版),2021, 42(2):131-138.CHEN Yue-xia, ZHA Qi-fen, JING Peng, et al. Modeling and analysis of autonomous technology acceptance considering age heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 42(2):131-138.
• [31]靳文博,翟国方,何仲禹,等.基于有序Logistic回归的城市总体规划建设用地指标与城市居民主观幸福感间关系研究[J].国际城市规划, 2018, 33(6):110-117.JIN Wen-bo, ZHAI Guo-fang, HE Zhong-yu, et al. Analysis of the relationship between urban development landuse planning indicators and subject well-being of inhabitant based on ordinal logistic regression[J]. Urban Planning International, 2018, 33(6):110-117.
• [32]温惠英,邓艳辉.公交出行各阶段时间对多群组乘客满意度的影响[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,44(4):1195-1206.WEN Hui-ying, DENG Yan-hui. Research on the impact of bus travel time of each stage on satisfaction of multigroup passengers[J]. Journal of Guangxi University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 44(4):1195-1206.
• [33]赵琳,边扬,荣建,等.基于有序Logistic回归的城市人行道服务水平研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2014, 14(4):131-138.ZHAO Lin, BIAN Yang, RONG Jian, et al. Pedestrian LOS of urban sidewalks based on orderly logistic regression[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2014, 14(4):131-138.
• [34]李俊杰,赵琪.基于有序Logit模型的扶贫车间工人满意度及其影响因素研究:以宁夏为例[J].管理学刊,2022, 35(5):19-37.LI Jun-jie, ZHAO Qi. Study on the satisfaction of poverty alleviation workshop workers and its influencing factors based on ordered logit model:take Ningxia as an example[J]. Journal of Management, 2022, 35(5):19-37.