nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 02, v.24 117-129
考虑动态行程时间及能耗的电动公交充电设施与充电调度联合优化
基金项目(Foundation): 江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20242054); 同济大学道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室开放基金资助项目(K202302)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19961/j.cnki.1672-4747.2025.08.019
发布时间: 2025-10-28
出版时间: 2025-10-28
网络发布时间: 2025-10-28
移动端阅读
摘要:

【背景】电动公交充电设施配置及充电调度受车辆行程时间与能耗的影响显著,以往研究较少综合考虑两者的时空动态特征。【目标】考虑车辆行程时间及能耗的动态特征,联合优化充电设施配置与实时充电调度,以降低电动公交运营成本并缓解电网压力。【方法】首先在设施配置阶段,以最小化总成本为目标,建立充电设施配置综合优化模型,确定快充桩规模、车载电池容量等参数;随后在充电调度阶段,以最小化充电成本为目标,构建实时滚动充电调度模型;最后基于实际公交运行数据,进行了案例分析。【结果】与以往慢充设施配置相比,充电设施配置综合优化模型使设施配置的总成本下降了约58%;与现状无序充电相比,实时滚动充电调度模型降低了约21%的充电运营成本,并估计了滚动时域最佳时间窗长度为180 min。【应用】研究成果对促进城市电动公交精细化运营调度有重要的理论及实践价值。

Abstract:

[Background] The configuration of electric bus charging infrastructure and charging scheduling is significantly influenced by dynamic fluctuations in travel time and energy consumption. Previous studies have rarely provided a comprehensive consideration of the spatiotemporal dynamics of vehicle travel time and energy consumption. [Objective] To consider the dynamic characteristics of travel time and energy consumption, and jointly optimize charging infrastructure configuration and real-time charging plans, in order to reduce operating costs and alleviate grid pressure.[Method] Firstly, in the infrastructure configuration stage, a charging infrastructure configuration optimization model is developed to minimize total system costs, determining the optimal parameters such as the scale of fast chargers and battery capacity. Subsequently, in the charging scheduling stage, a rolling-horizon optimization model is formulated to minimize charging costs. Then, a case study was conducted using the real-world bus operating data. [Result] Compared with conventional slow-charging infrastructure configuration, the charging infrastructure configuration model reduces total deployment costs by approximately 58%. Concurrently, real-time rolling-horizon charging scheduling achieves an approximately 21% reduction in operational charging costs compared with uncoordinated charging, and the optimal length of the rolling-horizon time window is estimated to be180 minutes. [Application] The findings hold significant theoretical and practical implications for advancing precision management in urban electric bus operations.

参考文献

[1]MCCABE D, BAN X. Optimal locations and sizes of layover charging stations for electric buses[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2023, 152:104157.

[2]张艳妃,张春勤,黄毅,等.中国省域交通运输碳排放空间网络特征研究[J].交通运输工程与信息学报, 2025,23(1):174-188.ZHANG Yanfei, ZHANG Chunqin, HUANG Yi, et al.Spatial correlation network of transportation carbon emissions in China[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2025, 23(1):174-188.

[3]HSU Y T, YAN S, HUANG P. The depot and charging facility location problem for electrifying urban bus services[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2021, 100:103053.

[4]ZHANG L, LIU Z, WANG W, et al. Long-term charging infrastructure deployment and bus fleet transition considering seasonal differences[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2022, 111:103429.

[5]ZHAO L, KE H, LI Y, et al. Research on personalized charging strategy of electric bus under time-varying constraints[J]. Energy, 2023, 276:127584.

[6]SULTANUDDIN S J, VIBIN R, RAJESH K A, et al. Development of improved reinforcement learning smart charging strategy for electric vehicle fleet[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 64:106987.

[7]胡宝雨,卢萌萌,高成.纯电动公交车辆调度与司机排班联合优化[J].大连交通大学学报, 2024, 45(5):8-15.HU Baoyu, LU Mengmeng, GAO Cheng. Joint optimization of pure electric bus vehicle and driver scheduling[J].Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University, 2024, 45(5):8-15.

[8]李斌,黄起彬.面向资源约束的电动公交车充电调度策略[J].交通运输工程与信息学报, 2024, 22(1):79-94.LI Bin, HUANG Qibin. Resource constraint-oriented charging scheduling strategy for electric buses[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2024, 22(1):79-94.

[9]HU H, DU B, LIU W, et al. A joint optimisation model for charger locating and electric bus charging scheduling considering opportunity fast charging and uncertainties[J].Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies,2022, 141:103732.

[10]LIU Y, DING Y, JIANG P, et al. Joint optimal design of electric bus service and charging facilities[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16:6155

[11]叶鑫宇,刘昊翔,龙建成.考虑充电需求的电动公交车运营优化模型与算法[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2023, 21(1):135-151.YE Xinyu, LIU Haoxiang, LONG Jiancheng. Optimization model and algorithm for electric bus operation considering charging demand[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2023, 21(1):135-151.

[12]HE Y, LIU Z, SONG Z. Integrated charging infrastructure planning and charging scheduling for battery electric bus systems[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2022, 111:103437.

[13]李欣,张赛,袁昀.时间波动环境下公交多线协同跨线调度优化[J].交通运输工程与信息学报, 2025, 23(1):119-134.LI Xin, ZHANG Sai, YUAN Yun. Optimization of multiline collaborative cross-line scheduling of buses in a timevarying environment[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2025, 23(1):119-134.

[14]熊杰,甘凯伦,李同飞,等.电动公交车队规模与充电桩配置协同优化[J].交通运输工程与信息学报, 2024,22(1):95-110.XIONG Jie, GAN Kailun, LI Tongfei, et al. Collaborative optimization of electric bus fleet size and charger deployment[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2024, 22(1):95-110.

[15]姚恩建,王鑫,刘莎莎,等.考虑机会充电与行程时间可靠性的区域多车型电动公交调度优化[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(4):151-165, 187.YAO Enjian, WANG Xin, LIU Shasha, et al. Regional electric bus scheduling optimization with multiple vehicle types considering opportunity charging and travel time reliability[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(4):151-165, 187.

[16]BENOLIEL P, JENN A, TAL G. Examining energy uncertainty in battery bus deployments for transit agencies in California[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2021, 98:102963.

[17]AN K. Battery electric bus infrastructure planning under demand uncertainty[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2020, 111:572-587.

[18]武慧荣,许泽新,欧阳超.充换电模式电动车医药冷链配送路径优化研究[J].大连交通大学学报, 2025, 46(4):38-48.WU Huirong, XU Zexin, OUYANG Chao. Pharmaceutical cold chain distribution path optimization of electric vehicles based on charging and swapping mode[J]. Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University, 2025, 46(4):38-48.

[19]BELOV D I, ARMSTRONG R D. Distributions of the Kullback-Leibler divergence with applications[J]. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,2011, 64(2):291-309.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19961/j.cnki.1672-4747.2025.08.019

中图分类号:TM910.6;U491.8

引用信息:

[1]单肖年,魏怡琳,赵娇娇,等.考虑动态行程时间及能耗的电动公交充电设施与充电调度联合优化[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2026,24(02):117-129.DOI:10.19961/j.cnki.1672-4747.2025.08.019.

基金信息:

江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20242054); 同济大学道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室开放基金资助项目(K202302)

发布时间:

2025-10-28

出版时间:

2025-10-28

网络发布时间:

2025-10-28

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文