| 2,148 | 6 | 323 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
城市道路交通网络作为城市运行的重要基础设施,在交通系统中发挥着不可替代的作用。然而,随着全球极端天气频繁发生,城市道路交通网络往往最先受到影响,如暴雨引发的严重内涝、洪水、地震等自然灾害能够广泛地对城市内部道路交通系统施加严重的破坏,从而严重地影响城市内部正常运转,造成大量经济损失、负面社会影响等。本文以非常规事件下的城市道路交通网络为对象,针对事件后恢复阶段的路网构建韧性评估框架,综合考虑维修调度成本、路段重要度,以及路网修复过程中用户的出行行为,建立了非常规事件下路网最优修复策略双层规划模型,并设计了基于修复重要度的大邻域搜索启发式算法求解模型。最后运用Sioux Falls道路网络验证本文所提方法的可行性与有效性,通过分析各维修方案在不同资源环境下的路网性能和路段流量变化,得出在确定资源环境下的最优维修方案。结果表明,在一定数量的维修队约束下,该模型得到的路网修复策略能最大限度地提升路网韧性,在修复过程中路网性能呈阶梯式上升。调度费用权重系数影响修复策略的制定,维修队数量为3,调度费用权重系数取值为0.50时,路网的恢复效果最好,韧性最高。本文所提出的方法不仅为实际修复方案制定提供理论支撑,还为管理者在非常规事件下的决策提供建议。
Abstract:Urban road-traffic networks are vital to transportation systems as they are critical infrastructures for city operations. Owing to the increased frequency of global extreme weather events,these networks are typically the first to be affected by natural disasters. Catastrophes, such as torrential rain-induced floods and earthquakes, can cause extensive damage to urban road systems, thus disrupting city functioning and exerting significant economic and social effects. This study focuses on urban road networks during recovery from post-unconventional events. A resilience-assessment framework is proposed that considers maintenance costs, road-segment importance, and traveler behavior during network restoration. A bilevel programming model for network-repair strategies under such events is established, in addition to a heuristic solution algorithm based on repair importance.The feasibility and effectiveness of the method are confirmed based on the Sioux Falls network case study, where the optimal repair strategy are determined within the specified resource constraints. The results indicate that network resilience can be enhanced significantly by adopting an appropriate repair plan, as indicated by the stepwise improvement in network performance during restoration. The number of maintenance teams and the weight of scheduling costs are key factors in strategy development. The optimal recovery and highest resilience are observed in three teams, in addition to a dispatch-cost weighting factor of 0.50. This study provides theoretical support for practical repair planning and decision-making guidance during emergencies..
[1]刘海旭,荣新.道路交通网络脆弱性评估[J].交通运输工程与信息学报, 2018, 16(2):94-99.LIU Haixu, RONG Xin. Evaluation of road traffic network vulnerability[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2018, 16(2):94-99.
[2]王丰,刘昊翔.基于双层规划的老城区自行车专用道网络设计[J].交通运输工程与信息学报, 2022, 20(4):72-87.WANG Feng, LIU Haoxiang. Design of bicycle lane network in China’s old city based on bi-level programming[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2022, 20(4):72-87.
[3] ZHAO T, ZHANG Y. Transportation infrastructure restoration optimization considering mobility and accessibility in resilience measures[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2020, 117:102700.
[4]毛新华,王建伟,袁长伟,等.基于韧性最优的灾后公路网修复调度研究[J].中国公路学报, 2022, 35(6):289-298.MAO Xinhua, WANG Jianwei, YUAN Changwei, et al.Restoration scheduling for post-disaster road networks based on resilience optimization[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(6):289-298.
[5] ZHANG X, MAHADEVAN S, GOEBEL K. Network reconfiguration for increasing transportation system resilience under extreme events[J]. Risk Analysis, 2019, 39(9):2054-2075.
[6] LI Z, JIN C, HU P, et al. Resilience-based transportation network recovery strategy during emergency recovery phase under uncertainty[J]. Reliability Engineering&System Safety, 2019, 188:503-514.
[7] HOLLING C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973, 4:1-23.
[8] FATURECHI R, MILLER-HOOKS E. Measuring the performance of transportation infrastructure systems in disasters:a comprehensive review[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2015, 21(1):04014025.
[9]殷凯.城市交通网络韧性综合评估研究:以中国40个城市路网为例[D].北京:北京交通大学, 2021.YIN Kai. Integrated resilience assessment of urban transportation network[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2021.
[10]马宝奎,柴浩,张志鹏.后疫情时期城市轨道交通客流特征与韧性探讨[J].综合运输, 2022, 44(7):75-80.MA Baokui, CHAI Hao, ZHANG Zhipeng. Assessment and countermeasures for urban rail transit resilience governance in post-pandemic era[J]. China Transportation Review, 2022, 44(7):75-80.
[11] MURRAY-TUITE P M. A comparison of transportation network resilience under simulated system optimum and user equilibrium conditions[C]//Proceedings of the 2006Winter Simulation Conference. Monterey, CA, USA:IEEE, 2006:1398-1405.
[12] GOKALP C, PATIL P N, BOYLES S D. Post-disaster recovery sequencing strategy for road networks[J]. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 2021, 153:228-245.
[13]王立夫,朱枫,郭戈,等.基于负载系数的轨道交通网络控制站点辨识[J].控制与决策, 2020, 35(10):2319-2328.WANG Lifu, ZHU Feng, GUO Ge, et al. Control station identification of rail transport network based on loading coefficient[J]. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(10):2319-2328.
[14] XU M, WU J, LIU M, et al. Discovery of critical nodes in road networks through mining from vehicle trajectories[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 20(2):583-593.
[15]张建旭,蒋燕.基于局部路网交通流重分配的路段关键度计算[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(1):105-110.ZHANG Jianxu, JIANG Yan. Criticality calculation of road links based on local network traffic flow redistribution[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(1):105-110.
[16]陆百川,舒芹,马广露,等.基于多属性TOPSIS决策的交通网络路段重要度计算[J].浙江工业大学学报,2020, 48(3):334-344.LU Baichuan, SHU Qin, MA Guanglu, et al. Importance degree calculation of links based on multi-attribute TOPSIS decision-making[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology, 2020, 48(3):334-344.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19961/j.cnki.1672-4747.2023.10.029
中图分类号:U491
引用信息:
[1]刘欣亚,屈云超,吴建军.考虑韧性和调度费用的城市路网修复策略[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2024,22(03):1-13.DOI:10.19961/j.cnki.1672-4747.2023.10.029.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(72288101,72331001,72171021)
2024-04-30
2024-04-30
2024-04-30