| 233 | 11 | 121 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
逆向物流具有准公共物品的特征,由此决定了它还具有正外部效应和负外部效应。正是由于负外部效应的存在,导致逆向物流系统的资源配置达不到帕雷托最优状态。本文在界定逆向物流外部效应的基础上,提出了政府干预逆向物流以实现外部效应内在化的措施,指出了政府干预的利弊,并对此过程中政府和企业的博弈关系进行了分析。
Abstract：Reverse logistics has positive externality on account of its feature of quasi-public goods. However, it also brings negative external effect. The resource configuration of reverse logistics cannot be perfect. As a result, pareto-optimality can’t be gained. On the base of defining the externality of reverse logistics, the connotation and characteristic of the externality are also revealed in this paper. In order to internalize the externality, government should take actions to correct the external effect of reverse logistics. The advantages and disadvantages of government intervention are pointed out. The game between government and enterprises is analyzed in the paper.
[1]向盛斌.逆向物流与环境保护[J].物流技术.2001,(1),总第106期.
[2]柳键.供应链的逆向物流[J].商业经济与管理,2002,128(6).
[3]米宁.逆向物流的产品回收网络模型[D].大连海事大学,2002.
[4]陆忠平.闭环供应链的渠道选择[J].物流技术,2002,(11).
[5]姚卫新.再制造条件下逆向物流回收模式的研究[J].管理科学,2004,17(1).
[6]王万山,伍世安.负外部性治理的经济效率分析[J].上海财经大学学报,2003,5(3).
[7]Roger Perman,Yue Ma,James McGilvray,Michael Common.Natural Resource and Environmental Economics[M].侯元兆译.北京:中国经济出版社,2002.
[8]Moritz Fleischmann,Hans Ronald Krikke,Rommert Dekker,et al.A characterization of logistics network for product recovery[J].Omega.The International Journal of Management Science.2000,(28):653-666.
[9]Horst Siebert.Economics of the environment[M].蒋敏元译.北京:中国林业出版社,2002.
基本信息:
中图分类号:F252
引用信息:
[1]王云儿,刘朝明.逆向物流外部效应及其政府干预研究[J],2006(04):76-81.