| 171 | 7 | 103 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
针对城市突发事件下人员疏散应急避难所的选择,从安全性、可达性、应急服务能力三个方面构建评价指标体系。考虑到评价指标的不确定性,采用指标区间评分和模糊集值统计理论确定评价指标权重值,利用TOPSIS法原理构建应急避难所选择综合评价模型,确定各评价指标的最优解与最劣解,通过计算各评价指标到最优解和最劣解的距离得到各备选应急避难所与最优解的接近程度,按照接近程度对各应急避难所进行排序。实例计算结果表明:到危险源距离、避难所容量、到医院距离、到救援物质仓库距离是避难所选择的主要因素,到最优解距离越小,接近程度越大,该应急避难所越优。
Abstract:For evacuation shelter choosing under emergency event in a city, an evaluation index system was established from the view points of safety, accessibility and emergency service capabilities. Considering the uncertainty of these evaluation indexes, and combined with the interval marking for each index with the theory of fuzzy set-valued statistics the evaluation index weight was determined. Then, a comprehensive evaluation model of emergency shelter choosing was constructed based on the TOPSIS method, and the optimal solution and the worst solution of each index were obtained. The distances between each alternative shelter and the optimal solution were obtained by calculated the distances from each index to the optimal solution and the worst solution. Each alternative shelter was sorted according to the distances. The greater the distance was, the better the alternative shelter would be. An example showed that: the distances to the hazardous point, to the hospital, to the rescue material warehouse and the capacity of shelter were the main factors for a temporary shelter choosing. If the distance to the optimal solution was samller and the distance was shorter, the emergency shelter would be better.
[1]陈志芬,顾林生,陈晋等.城市应急避难场所层次布局研究(I)——层次性分析[J].自然灾害学报,2010,19(03):151-155.
[2]Liu Q.,Ruan X.J.,Shi P.L.,Selection of emergency shelter sites for seismic disasters in mountainous regions:Lessons from the 2008Wenchuan Ms 8.0 Earthquake,China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2011,40(4):926-934.
[3]Li A.C.Y.,Nozick L.,Xu N.X.,et al.Shelter location and transportation planning under hurricane conditions[J].Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review,2012,48(4):715-729.
[4]陈志芬,李强,陈晋.城市应急避难场所层次布局研究(Ⅱ)——三级层次选址模型[J].自然灾害学报,2010,19(05):13-19.
[5]周亚飞,刘茂,王丽.基于多目标规划的城市避难场所选址研究[J].安全与环境学报,2010,10(03):205-209.
[6]初建宇,马丹祥,苏幼坡.基于理想点的已知部分属性权重信息中心避难场所选址方法研究[J].自然灾害学报,2012,21(04):28-32.
[7]黄典剑,吴宗之,蔡嗣经等.城市应急避难所的应急适应能力——基于层次分析法的评价方法[J].自然灾害学报,2006,15(01):52-58.
[8]吴宗之,黄典剑,蔡嗣经等.基于模糊集值理论的城市应急避难所应急适应能力评价方法研究[J].安全与环境学报,2005,5(06):100-103.
[9]Zhang L.S.,Meng D.G.,Dong Y.Y.,et al.Construction situation and countermeasure of urban emergency evacuation refuge[A].Electric Technology and Civil Engineering(ICETCE)[C].Lushan:International Conference,2011:1125-1127.
[10]陈志芬,李强,王瑜等.应急避难场所建设进度优化模型研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2010,20(02):160-164.
[11]黄河潮,林鹏,卢兆明.p-中位数法在城市应急避难所规划中的应用[A].中国灾害防御协会—风险分析专业委员会第一届年会论文集[C].中国灾害防御协会——风险分析专业委员会第一届年会,北京:2004:62-66.
[12]周晓猛,刘茂,王阳.紧急避难场所优化布局理论研究[J].安全与环境学报,2006,6(增):118-121.
[13]Chu J.Y.,Su Y.P..The application of TOPSIS method in selecting fixed seismic shelter for evacuation in cities[J].Systems Engineering Procedia,2012,3:391-397.
[14]晏远春,刘浩学,张永等.基于模糊TOPSIS的道路危险货物运输企业安全评价方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2010,20(09):32-37.
[15]安萌,陆卫,陈学武等.基于TOPSIS法的自行车停车场布局应用研究——南京鼓楼地铁站实例分析[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2010,8(2):87-92,110.
基本信息:
中图分类号:TU984.116
引用信息:
[1]宋伟程.基于模糊集值理论和TOPSIS法的应急避难所选择研究[J],2014,12(03):108-114.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金资助(71173177)